Research sprint
One blocked question, answered with a working prototype and a written verdict. Fixed scope, fixed price.
You need to know if it's possible.
Six steps, in the same order, every time. Not because process is precious — because skipping one is how AI projects quietly become nine-month experiments.
We start with the constraint, not the technology. What must be true for this to be worth doing — and what happens if it isn't.
The system drawn before it is built. Layer by layer, with the trade-offs written down where they can be argued with.
The riskiest assumption, built first and measured against a real evaluation set. Fast enough to be wrong cheaply.
Down the stack. Quality, latency and cost pushed until the curve flattens and further effort stops paying.
Shipped with the unglamorous parts intact: monitoring, rollback, on-call notes and a team that can operate it without us.
Models move, data drifts, costs change. A cadence of evaluation and tuning that keeps the system from quietly decaying.
Sized to the decision in front of you rather than the budget cycle behind it.
One blocked question, answered with a working prototype and a written verdict. Fixed scope, fixed price.
You need to know if it's possible.
We join your team and build the system with them, layer by layer, leaving behind engineers who can operate it.
You need it shipped and owned.
Architecture review, model decisions, cost audits and a second opinion on the calls that are expensive to reverse.
You have the team, not the depth.
Layers of the stack, worked end to end
From first call to a measurable prototype
Typical inference cost reduction
Engagements handed over with a runbook
Thirty minutes, no deck. We'll ask what you're building, where it hurts, and what you've already tried.
Typical reply within one working day.